Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:41

Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Menopause Drug Reduces Breast Cancer Growth In Clinical Trial - ScienceAlert
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What are some good books on AI ethics?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Over 3,000 Private Credit Deals From Just 20 Analysts Raise Questions on Wall Street - Bloomberg.com
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
2025 Chiefs Training Camp Presented by Mosaic Life Care - Kansas City Chiefs
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why do liberals have a problem with masculine men like Andrew Tate?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
NYC summer stargazing seasons kicks off with triangle, meteor showers - Gothamist